Skip to main content

Will they take the risk?


This New York Times published an opinion piece about safe injecting facilities, promoting the use of these sites in the United States. Although we’re majorly behind on this issue, at least it’s being addressed. A little… According to the editorial board at the New York Times, some states have approved and are on track to opening facilities that will aid people in using drugs like heroin, so that they’re injecting in safer and cleaner environments. Other states are looking into this method but don’t have the support of the community. This method will decrease the spread of HIV because a vast amount of users share needles. It will also improve quality of life in certain areas, decrease the amount of people being incarcerated every year, and prevent overdose. So far the sites that have already opened have been successful in decreasing the amount of overdose. I do think this idea could potentially cause trouble, but the direction we’re headed in isn’t any less troublesome. My concerns would mostly be safety. Will the nurses have security in the event of someone breaking in? How will they know they are administering the correct amount? These are only small problems, most likely prevented by hiring security and a little bit of science. But besides my concerns, I agree with this article in that doing something about this issue is key in promoting change. Arresting drug users normally leads to more drug use and that’s the cycle that started this in the first place. This seems a little extreme and most citizens think this is the opposite of what our government is striving to accomplish, but at this rate something different and actually effective has to be done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Article

D A C A Say What? This past year, a threat to DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, has hit the press with the possible threat of rescinding. This would mean a large number of children and adults could be deported. DACA was established by Barack Obama in June of 2012 with plans to revise DACA requirements so that other illegal immigrants can also be covered. Texas has a very large amount of DACA recipients and a number of them are not only students but teachers as well. Five years after this was settled, President Trump has made threats to eliminate DACA which would considerably change our everyday lives in America.This article is a great example of who and what will be affected if Trump decides to abolish the act. https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2018/01/29/579682676/nearly-9-000-daca-teachers-face-an-uncertain-future

Grifter or Gipper?

Is Trump a grifter? Was Ronald Reagan a Gipper? According to the dictionary, a grifter is basically a conman. The term “Gipper” came from Ronald Reagan’s short-term acting career when he plays a football star from the 1920’s. So far into Trump's presidency, there's been more mischief and golf than actual change. Although Ronald Reagan wasn't the coolest of presidents, the scandals under his control were less scandalous. In this article,   Reagan was the Gipper. Trump is the grifter. , written by Max Boot, he evaluates some of the problems under Ragans control and some under Trump's circus ring. I think the writer did a good job of assessing issues they've both experienced under their administration. Max Boot is arguing claims that president Donald Trump is actually better than Ronald Reagan. Boot says in the beginning of the article that supporters believed that Trump “ was the second coming of Ronald Reagan” but after he was elected, supporters think he became bett...