Skip to main content

Will they take the risk?


This New York Times published an opinion piece about safe injecting facilities, promoting the use of these sites in the United States. Although we’re majorly behind on this issue, at least it’s being addressed. A little… According to the editorial board at the New York Times, some states have approved and are on track to opening facilities that will aid people in using drugs like heroin, so that they’re injecting in safer and cleaner environments. Other states are looking into this method but don’t have the support of the community. This method will decrease the spread of HIV because a vast amount of users share needles. It will also improve quality of life in certain areas, decrease the amount of people being incarcerated every year, and prevent overdose. So far the sites that have already opened have been successful in decreasing the amount of overdose. I do think this idea could potentially cause trouble, but the direction we’re headed in isn’t any less troublesome. My concerns would mostly be safety. Will the nurses have security in the event of someone breaking in? How will they know they are administering the correct amount? These are only small problems, most likely prevented by hiring security and a little bit of science. But besides my concerns, I agree with this article in that doing something about this issue is key in promoting change. Arresting drug users normally leads to more drug use and that’s the cycle that started this in the first place. This seems a little extreme and most citizens think this is the opposite of what our government is striving to accomplish, but at this rate something different and actually effective has to be done.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Grifter or Gipper?

Is Trump a grifter? Was Ronald Reagan a Gipper? According to the dictionary, a grifter is basically a conman. The term “Gipper” came from Ronald Reagan’s short-term acting career when he plays a football star from the 1920’s. So far into Trump's presidency, there's been more mischief and golf than actual change. Although Ronald Reagan wasn't the coolest of presidents, the scandals under his control were less scandalous. In this article,   Reagan was the Gipper. Trump is the grifter. , written by Max Boot, he evaluates some of the problems under Ragans control and some under Trump's circus ring. I think the writer did a good job of assessing issues they've both experienced under their administration. Max Boot is arguing claims that president Donald Trump is actually better than Ronald Reagan. Boot says in the beginning of the article that supporters believed that Trump “ was the second coming of Ronald Reagan” but after he was elected, supporters think he became bett...

In response to Josh's Blog, 'Turn it off'

I completely agree with your post about higher ranked government officials forfeiting their social media accounts. If it's impossible to keep them from posting on social media at all, they somehow need to be heavily regulated. When the president posts on social media, not only is it unprofessional, it is also raising concerns about poor mental health. This is a major loss of credibility, a big step backward for America and for the development our government needs. The posts on Twitter by Donald Trump is indefinitely giving people the wrong idea of authority and become a very poor influence towards society. This controversy needs to be appropriately addressed before things escalate and get more out of hand.  

It's about time we figure out health care

This article really opened my eyes to what healthcare is really about... Money. I've been blessed with good insurance but even after paying more than $300 a month for the "good kind" of insurance, I still have to pay $800 or more out of pocket for certain things. So far, I haven't encountered a problem with being billed twice or getting charged for something that never happened, but this problem is happening more and more every year. The American Hospital Association created 'The Patient Bill of Rights' in the 1970's and amended it in 1992. This bill of rights was written so that people have the right to be treated properly no matter their financial situation and given the proper healthcare treatment. Since this was written, states have been given the ability to redefine and rewrite these rights, leaving our current rules in healthcare confusing. I strongly agree that there should be a financial bill of rights in healthcare for everyone so that patients k...